Tuesday, February 16, 2010
say what's good to...ARISE x CIARA
say what's good to...CUPCAKES
Cupcakes. Who would’ve thought that with one transient shot on a Sex and the City episode, these delectable delights would still be trendy four years later. Before, there was only Magnolia. But now, there’s Billy’s, Crumbs, Georgetown, Buttercup Bake Shop, Cupcake Stop and Sprinkles. Even still, something’s been missing. When it comes to the slightly tougher, slightly rougher cupcakes, where could one turn? Butch Bakery.
(reposted from PatternPulp.com)
Friday, February 5, 2010
say what's good to...PI PHI x CORNELL
Recently, the rush chair for the Cornell chapter of Pi Phi issued a seven-page memo regulating what sisters can and can’t wear during recruitment. While it’s not new for distinct groups to align themselves with certain brands, what's really interesting are which labels the rush chair uses to signify just how “casually chic” Pi Phi is in hopes of gaining campus-wide acceptance. [disclaimer: I am P-I-B-E-T-A-P-H-I of the University of Virginia Epsilon chapter and am well aware of rush dress codes. Ours just wasn't as desperate.]
Anyway, Anthropologist, Grant McCracken theorizes that distinct groups of people, or flocks, adopt trends based on a risk-safety ratio. Trends trickle down from small chaotic pockets and grow based on their commercial appeal for the masses.
And while it might seem like I'm looking down on these girls because they endorse shoes I can't stand, the real issue I have is the lack of creativity that a dress code like this stifles. Yes, the tome gives great advice( NO CAMEL TOES) but really, no satin unless it's D&G? That just seems a little bit forced, wouldn't you agree?
Check out the full memo at Pattern Pulp (where I'm a new contributor!)
Thursday, January 14, 2010
say what's good to...CRYSTAL RENN
She's shot editorials for everyone from Glamour, to Elle, to the controversial spread "One Size Fit's All" for V Magazine. In this spread, Renn sports the same designer fashion as another model who is a size 2. It's supposed to show that big girls can wear the same clothes as well as, if not better than, the rail thin models that fill glossies every month.
Unfortunately, I think this spread fails on a couple different fronts. Number 1: As Renn said herself: editors are essentially fetishizing "fat". “When designers and editors choose one fat girl to salivate over, and revel in her avoirdupois, I’m not sure how much it advances the cause of using girls of all sizes in a magazine.” she wrote. Just as editors patted themselves on the back when the All Black Models issue of Vogue Italia came out, now they can move ahead with their preferred skinny models because they'll always be able to look back to the ONE issue where they featured big girls and yell "SEE! We include everyone on our pages!" Pure bullshit, if you ask me. Number 2: Did you know that many of these "plus size" models are size 10 and 12 [which in my head is actually NORMAL], and have ADMITTED to using padding on set to make themselves a size 20? I mean, what the hell sort of twisted logic is that? Either way, the images we see every month are false. And finally: What happens to the size 6 or size 8 girl? Where are they supposed to fit into this? Unfortunately, the whole situation seems like an all or nothing equation which essentially hurts everyone in the end. Big, skinny, small or little, all the images are altered. The sooner we can not only admit but truly understand that, the sooner we can move past these blip in the pan, glorification issues, and finally get on with the show.